From: dwalsh@redhat.com (Daniel J Walsh) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:57:48 -0500 Subject: [refpolicy] system_logging.patch In-Reply-To: <4B0C0231.8060100@redhat.com> References: <4AFC886C.7000208@redhat.com> <1259073178.27504.733.camel@gorn.columbia.tresys.com> <4B0C0231.8060100@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4B0C027C.60607@redhat.com> To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com On 11/24/2009 10:56 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > On 11/24/2009 09:32 AM, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote: >> On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 17:13 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >>> http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/F12/system_logging.patch >>> Latest audit system handling. >> >> >>> -/var/run/audit_events -s gen_context(system_u:object_r:auditd_var_run_t,s0) >>> -/var/run/audispd_events -s gen_context(system_u:object_r:audisp_var_run_t,s0) >>> -/var/run/auditd\.pid -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:auditd_var_run_t,s0) >>> -/var/run/auditd_sock -s gen_context(system_u:object_r:auditd_var_run_t,s0) >>> +/var/run/audit_events -s gen_context(system_u:object_r:auditd_var_run_t,mls_systemhigh) >>> +/var/run/audispd_events -s gen_context(system_u:object_r:audisp_var_run_t,mls_systemhigh) >>> +/var/run/auditd\.pid -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:auditd_var_run_t,mls_systemhigh) >>> +/var/run/auditd_sock -s gen_context(system_u:object_r:auditd_var_run_t,mls_systemhigh) >>> /var/run/klogd\.pid -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:klogd_var_run_t,s0) >>> /var/run/log -s gen_context(system_u:object_r:devlog_t,s0) >>> /var/run/metalog\.pid -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:syslogd_var_run_t,s0) >>> /var/run/syslogd\.pid -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:syslogd_var_run_t,s0) >> >> Why do sockets need to be system high? >> So processes that listen on these socketes have to be system_high. They are providing system_high information. >>> +optional_policy(` >>> + dbus_system_bus_client(audisp_t) >>> + >>> + optional_policy(` >>> + setroubleshoot_dbus_chat(audisp_t) >>> + ') >>> +') >> >> Is audisp actually doing this, or is it a script it runs that is doing >> this? If its the latter, it needs its own policy. >> >> > It is sedisp, so I guess it could have its own policy. > _______________________________________________ > refpolicy mailing list > refpolicy at oss.tresys.com > http://oss.tresys.com/mailman/listinfo/refpolicy