From: mgrepl@redhat.com (Miroslav Grepl)
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:20:23 +0100
Subject: [refpolicy] services_nut.patch
In-Reply-To: <1261745700.2157.6.camel@localhost>
References: <4AFC823D.3090202@redhat.com>	 <1258381900.5120.16.camel@localhost>
	<4B019ACD.4010406@redhat.com>	 <1258901980.2423.16.camel@localhost>
	<4B0A88B7.1050903@redhat.com>	 <1258987001.3109.6.camel@localhost>	
	<1258989561.27504.643.camel@gorn.columbia.tresys.com>	
	<1258992270.4516.13.camel@localhost>
	<1258992547.4516.17.camel@localhost>	 <4B0AC3B1.20003@redhat.com>	
	<1261144417.26160.272.camel@gorn.columbia.tresys.com>	
	<1261390459.2952.2.camel@localhost>
	<1261745700.2157.6.camel@localhost>
Message-ID: <4B630AC7.1080008@redhat.com>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

On 12/25/2009 01:55 PM, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 11:14 +0100, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote:
>    
>> On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 08:53 -0500, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
>> [...]
>>      
>>> Was there any resolution on this?
>>>        
>> Yes, but I had no physical access to my UPS for the last two weeks. At
>> the end of this week I will have physical access again and then I will
>> check that the policy is really working fine. So I expect a
>> tested/working policy in one to two weeks.
>>      
> I take the discussion back on list. Miroslav, from the latest policy I
> did not change anything except I removed the duplicate policies for the
> cgi scripts and uncommented the *_ups_port() stuff.
>
> I'm fine with the attached policy (tested several times including a
> shutdown and cgi services). Is the policy OK for you too?
>    
I apologize, but I missed this last post from Stefan. Actually we use 
this policy in Fedora so I believe the policy is ready.

The following link includes the nut policy what we have in Fedora.

http://mgrepl.fedorapeople.org/SELinux/F12/services_nut.patch

Regards,
Miroslav