From: cpebenito@tresys.com (Christopher J. PeBenito)
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 08:47:37 -0500
Subject: [refpolicy] services_nut.patch
In-Reply-To: <1261745700.2157.6.camel@localhost>
References: <4AFC823D.3090202@redhat.com>
	<1258381900.5120.16.camel@localhost>  <4B019ACD.4010406@redhat.com>
	<1258901980.2423.16.camel@localhost>  <4B0A88B7.1050903@redhat.com>
	<1258987001.3109.6.camel@localhost>
	<1258989561.27504.643.camel@gorn.columbia.tresys.com>
	<1258992270.4516.13.camel@localhost>
	<1258992547.4516.17.camel@localhost> <4B0AC3B1.20003@redhat.com>
	<1261144417.26160.272.camel@gorn.columbia.tresys.com>
	<1261390459.2952.2.camel@localhost> <1261745700.2157.6.camel@localhost>
Message-ID: <1265723257.911.2.camel@gorn.columbia.tresys.com>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

On Fri, 2009-12-25 at 13:55 +0100, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 11:14 +0100, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 08:53 -0500, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Was there any resolution on this?
> > 
> > Yes, but I had no physical access to my UPS for the last two weeks. At
> > the end of this week I will have physical access again and then I will
> > check that the policy is really working fine. So I expect a
> > tested/working policy in one to two weeks.
> 
> I take the discussion back on list. Miroslav, from the latest policy I
> did not change anything except I removed the duplicate policies for the
> cgi scripts and uncommented the *_ups_port() stuff.
> 
> I'm fine with the attached policy (tested several times including a
> shutdown and cgi services). Is the policy OK for you too?

Merged.

-- 
Chris PeBenito
Tresys Technology, LLC
(410) 290-1411 x150