From: cpebenito@tresys.com (Christopher J. PeBenito)
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:44:09 -0500
Subject: [refpolicy] services_plymouth.patch
In-Reply-To: <4AFC82D1.2050408@redhat.com>
References: <4AFC82D1.2050408@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1266349449.11694.45.camel@gorn.columbia.tresys.com>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 16:49 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/F12/services_plymouth.patch
> 
> New plymouth policy.

This needs some cleanup.  The files are plymouth, but the
policy_module() is plymouthd.  They're supposed to be the same, so pick
one.  And then make sure the interface naming is consistent, eg:

if the module name is plymouth:

plymouth_domtrans() means transition to plymouth_t


of the module name is plymouthd:

plymouthd_domtrans() means transition to plymouthd_t

and the other interfaces would have to be adjusted to follow suit.

-- 
Chris PeBenito
Tresys Technology, LLC
(410) 290-1411 x150