From: michal.svoboda@agents.felk.cvut.cz (Michal Svoboda)
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 21:14:25 +0100
Subject: [refpolicy] Possible regression and bug in
 userdom_base_user_template
In-Reply-To: <20100301174828.pdj3qn7guaswg8g8@legacy.mxes.net>
References: <20100301102220.GF3990@myhost.felk.cvut.cz>
	<1267450925.30557.7.camel@gorn.columbia.tresys.com>
	<20100301150133.GG3990@myhost.felk.cvut.cz>
	<1267457544.30557.30.camel@gorn.columbia.tresys.com>
	<20100301170324.GI3990@myhost.felk.cvut.cz>
	<20100301174828.pdj3qn7guaswg8g8@legacy.mxes.net>
Message-ID: <20100301201425.GJ3990@myhost.felk.cvut.cz>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

Martin Orr wrote:
> Yes, this is a Debian only patch.  According to my history, it was
> added somewhere between 0.0.20080702-1 and 0.0.20080702-4.

Sigh. I guess the reasoning behind this is the same as in fedora? I'm
getting a little dizzy about these distro specific patches. Sad too.

Michal Svoboda
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://oss.tresys.com/pipermail/refpolicy/attachments/20100301/d0eb6518/attachment.bin