From: cpebenito@tresys.com (Christopher J. PeBenito)
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 09:13:16 -0500
Subject: [refpolicy] Possible regression and bug in
 userdom_base_user_template
In-Reply-To: <20100301201425.GJ3990@myhost.felk.cvut.cz>
References: <20100301102220.GF3990@myhost.felk.cvut.cz>
	<1267450925.30557.7.camel@gorn.columbia.tresys.com>
	<20100301150133.GG3990@myhost.felk.cvut.cz>
	<1267457544.30557.30.camel@gorn.columbia.tresys.com>
	<20100301170324.GI3990@myhost.felk.cvut.cz>
	<20100301174828.pdj3qn7guaswg8g8@legacy.mxes.net>
	<20100301201425.GJ3990@myhost.felk.cvut.cz>
Message-ID: <1267539196.30557.71.camel@gorn.columbia.tresys.com>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 21:14 +0100, Michal Svoboda wrote:
> Martin Orr wrote:
> > Yes, this is a Debian only patch.  According to my history, it was
> > added somewhere between 0.0.20080702-1 and 0.0.20080702-4.
> 
> Sigh. I guess the reasoning behind this is the same as in fedora? I'm
> getting a little dizzy about these distro specific patches. Sad too.

Well, unfortunately, thats how things work in Linux distros.  If you
look at Fedora cvs or other distros' packaging RCSs, you'll see patching
happening on many packages.

-- 
Chris PeBenito
Tresys Technology, LLC
(410) 290-1411 x150