From: gizmo@giz-works.com (Chris Richards)
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:13:59 -0500
Subject: [refpolicy] services_ftp.patch
In-Reply-To: <20100426210255.34962f60@city-fan.org>
References: <4B8452B1.5090503@redhat.com>
	<1272309647.32279.232.camel@gorn>	<4BD5EB3A.3080409@giz-works.com>
	<20100426210255.34962f60@city-fan.org>
Message-ID: <4BD60217.7050200@giz-works.com>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

On 04/26/2010 03:02 PM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> Not just ProFTPd. See discussion here:
>
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/selinux/2009-February/010463.html
>
> Paul.
>    

This probably isn't a discussion to have here, but I've really got toask: wouldn't we be better served using PAM with the mysql plugin forthis kind of stuff?