From: domg472@gmail.com (Dominick Grift)
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 21:26:38 +0200
Subject: [refpolicy] [ userdom_user_tmp_content patch 1/1] Create
 userdom_user_tmp_content,
 and replace existing user tmp content type declarations by it.
In-Reply-To: <4C3B5A49.6030004@tresys.com>
References: <20100709143453.GA9716@localhost.localdomain>
	<4C3B5A49.6030004@tresys.com>
Message-ID: <4C3B6C6E.80601@gmail.com>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

On 07/12/2010 08:09 PM, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
<snip>
>>
>>   ########################################
>>   ##<summary>
>> +##    Make the specified type usable user
>> +##    temporary content.
>> +##</summary>
>> +##<param name="domain">
>> +##    <summary>
>> +##    Domain using the user temporary
>> +##    content.
>> +##    </summary>
>> +##</param>
>> +##<param name="file_type">
>> +##    <summary>
>> +##    Type to be used for user temporary
>> +##    content.
>> +##    </summary>
>> +##</param>
>> +#
>> +interface(`userdom_user_tmp_content',`
>> +    files_tmp_file($2)
>> +    files_poly_member_tmp($1, $2)
>> +    ubac_constrained($2)
>> +')
> 
> Why do we have files_poly_member_tmp()?  I didn't see any places where
> it was removed above.

I guess there aren't any in refpolicy (except userdom_manage_tmp_role).
Does that mean there should not be any?

>> _______________________________________________
>> refpolicy mailing list
>> refpolicy at oss.tresys.com
>> http://oss.tresys.com/mailman/listinfo/refpolicy
> 
> 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://oss.tresys.com/pipermail/refpolicy/attachments/20100712/28e5ab75/attachment.bin