From: domg472@gmail.com (Dominick Grift) Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 14:57:53 +0200 Subject: [refpolicy] [alsa patch 1/1] Interaction with alsa home content by confined users. In-Reply-To: <4C88D931.2010807@tresys.com> References: <20100908104106.GA31213@localhost.localdomain> <4C88D931.2010807@tresys.com> Message-ID: <20100909125752.GD16089@localhost.localdomain> To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 08:55:13AM -0400, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote: > On 09/08/10 06:41, Dominick Grift wrote: > >Confined users can manage and relabel alsa home files. > > > >Plus some cleanups inspired by example policy. > > > >Signed-off-by: Dominick Grift > >--- > [...] > >diff --git a/policy/modules/roles/staff.te b/policy/modules/roles/staff.te > >index 0c9876c..f9c23ed 100644 > >--- a/policy/modules/roles/staff.te > >+++ b/policy/modules/roles/staff.te > >@@ -53,6 +53,11 @@ optional_policy(` > > > > ifndef(`distro_redhat',` > > optional_policy(` > >+ alsa_manage_home_files(staff_t) > >+ alsa_relabel_home_files(staff_t) > >+ ') > > Is there a reason why this needs to be excluded on redhat systems? Yes confined users can manage and relabel all userdom_user_home_content by default (so its redundant) > > -- > Chris PeBenito > Tresys Technology, LLC > www.tresys.com | oss.tresys.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://oss.tresys.com/pipermail/refpolicy/attachments/20100909/22228b2d/attachment.bin