From: jsolt@tresys.com (Jeremy Solt) Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 10:20:53 -0400 Subject: [refpolicy] [PATCH] hadoop 1/10 -- unconfined In-Reply-To: <4C9B5262.7080405@tycho.ncsc.mil> References: <20100921195753.GA5706@localhost.localdomain> <1285099440.1806.13.camel@jeremy-ubuntu> <4C9B5262.7080405@tycho.ncsc.mil> Message-ID: <1285338053.1772.90.camel@jeremy-ubuntu> To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 09:13 -0400, Paul Nuzzi wrote: > On 09/21/2010 04:04 PM, Jeremy Solt wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 21:57 +0200, Dominick Grift wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Dominick Grift > > Thanks Dominick. > > > > Paul, are you going to include all of his changes in your patch set? > > I guess it depends how we want to structure the patch. Do we want to upstream 9 different > modules or one monolithic one? > Does it make sense to have any of these modules without the rest of hadoop? I see that zookeeper is a subproject of hadoop. Could it be used separately or is it only used with hadoop systems? If they're all dependent on each other, then I think they should be in one module. > >> --- > >> :100644 100644 2ecdde8... 7a1b5de... M policy/modules/kernel/corenetwork.te.in > >> :000000 100644 0000000... d88b5ff... A policy/modules/services/hadoop.fc > >> :000000 100644 0000000... 6cc0049... A policy/modules/services/hadoop.if > >> :000000 100644 0000000... 53a242b... A policy/modules/services/hadoop.te > >> policy/modules/kernel/corenetwork.te.in | 4 + > >> policy/modules/services/hadoop.fc | 40 ++++ > >> policy/modules/services/hadoop.if | 247 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> policy/modules/services/hadoop.te | 347 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> 4 files changed, 638 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > >> -- Jeremy J. Solt Tresys Technology, LLC 410-290-1411 x122