From: dwalsh@redhat.com (Daniel J Walsh)
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 09:19:04 -0400
Subject: [refpolicy] [ patch 37/44] sudo: do not audit attempts to
 search /root.
In-Reply-To: <4CAF1915.1030901@tresys.com>
References: <1286216636-28449-1-git-send-email-domg472@gmail.com>	<1286216636-28449-39-git-send-email-domg472@gmail.com>	<4CAF15C9.4000605@tresys.com>	<20101008130103.GB15409@localhost.localdomain>	<4CAF168B.7080409@tresys.com>	<20101008130744.GC15409@localhost.localdomain>	<4CAF187B.808@tresys.com>
	<4CAF1915.1030901@tresys.com>
Message-ID: <4CAF1A48.1080804@redhat.com>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/08/2010 09:13 AM, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
> On 10/08/10 09:11, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
>> On 10/08/10 09:07, Dominick Grift wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 09:03:07AM -0400, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
>>>> On 10/08/10 09:01, Dominick Grift wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 08:59:53AM -0400, Christopher J. PeBenito
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On 10/04/10 14:23, Dominick Grift wrote:
>>>>>>> diff --git a/policy/modules/admin/sudo.if
>>>>>>> b/policy/modules/admin/sudo.if
>>>>>>> index ca36b15..da2afce 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/policy/modules/admin/sudo.if
>>>>>>> +++ b/policy/modules/admin/sudo.if
>>>>>>> @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ template(`sudo_role_template',`
>>>>>>> files_read_usr_symlinks($1_sudo_t)
>>>>>>> files_getattr_usr_files($1_sudo_t)
>>>>>>> # for some PAM modules and for cwd
>>>>>>> + files_dontaudit_list_default($1_sudo_t)
>>>>>>> files_dontaudit_search_home($1_sudo_t)
>>>>>>> files_list_tmp($1_sudo_t)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm confused, /root shouldn't be default_t.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why not, what do you think it should be?
>>>>
>>>> There shouldn't be any default_t files if it can be helped. I would
>>>> expect user_home_dir_t or admin_home_dir_t if you're on Fedora.
>>>
>>> This patch set is to make "refpolicy" work on minimal fedora
>>> installations. Its not so much about trying to merge every fedora
>>> change to refpolicy.
>>>
>>> However if you are interested in implementing Fedora's admin_home_t i
>>> guess i could try that instead. That would mean that for now you can
>>> disregard all " default" patches.
>>>
>>> I just was of the opinion that refpolicy is not interested in
>>> implementing fedoras admin_home_t solution, and rather stick to
>>> default_t for /root
>>
>> No, /root should definitely not be default_t. If thats what you're
>> getting out of refpolicy head, we need to figure out why.
> 
> To clarify, I would expect it to be user_home_dir_t in refpolicy.
> 
> 
If you are using the latest Fedora libsemanage, it is running
genhomedircon, so this might leave /root without a label.

Edit /etc/selinux/semanage.conf

And change
# semanage fcontext -a -e /home /althome
usepasswd=FALSE




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkyvGkgACgkQrlYvE4MpobOzHACfahQzaVd58ejJXbLR5087c7kF
6+gAn3WEnHukjC/7nDeUGi4dBPX+6ncS
=GgzZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----