From: domg472@gmail.com (Dominick Grift)
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 15:31:42 +0200
Subject: [refpolicy] [ patch 37/44] sudo: do not audit attempts to
 search /root.
In-Reply-To: <4CAF1915.1030901@tresys.com>
References: <1286216636-28449-1-git-send-email-domg472@gmail.com>
	<1286216636-28449-39-git-send-email-domg472@gmail.com>
	<4CAF15C9.4000605@tresys.com>
	<20101008130103.GB15409@localhost.localdomain>
	<4CAF168B.7080409@tresys.com>
	<20101008130744.GC15409@localhost.localdomain>
	<4CAF187B.808@tresys.com> <4CAF1915.1030901@tresys.com>
Message-ID: <20101008133141.GB6366@localhost.localdomain>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 09:13:57AM -0400, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
> On 10/08/10 09:11, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
> >On 10/08/10 09:07, Dominick Grift wrote:
> >>On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 09:03:07AM -0400, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
> >>>On 10/08/10 09:01, Dominick Grift wrote:
> >>>>On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 08:59:53AM -0400, Christopher J. PeBenito
> >>>>wrote:
> >>>>>On 10/04/10 14:23, Dominick Grift wrote:
> >>>>>>diff --git a/policy/modules/admin/sudo.if
> >>>>>>b/policy/modules/admin/sudo.if
> >>>>>>index ca36b15..da2afce 100644
> >>>>>>--- a/policy/modules/admin/sudo.if
> >>>>>>+++ b/policy/modules/admin/sudo.if
> >>>>>>@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ template(`sudo_role_template',`
> >>>>>>files_read_usr_symlinks($1_sudo_t)
> >>>>>>files_getattr_usr_files($1_sudo_t)
> >>>>>># for some PAM modules and for cwd
> >>>>>>+ files_dontaudit_list_default($1_sudo_t)
> >>>>>>files_dontaudit_search_home($1_sudo_t)
> >>>>>>files_list_tmp($1_sudo_t)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>I'm confused, /root shouldn't be default_t.
> >>>>
> >>>>Why not, what do you think it should be?
> >>>
> >>>There shouldn't be any default_t files if it can be helped. I would
> >>>expect user_home_dir_t or admin_home_dir_t if you're on Fedora.
> >>
> >>This patch set is to make "refpolicy" work on minimal fedora
> >>installations. Its not so much about trying to merge every fedora
> >>change to refpolicy.
> >>
> >>However if you are interested in implementing Fedora's admin_home_t i
> >>guess i could try that instead. That would mean that for now you can
> >>disregard all " default" patches.
> >>
> >>I just was of the opinion that refpolicy is not interested in
> >>implementing fedoras admin_home_t solution, and rather stick to
> >>default_t for /root
> >
> >No, /root should definitely not be default_t. If thats what you're
> >getting out of refpolicy head, we need to figure out why.
> 
> To clarify, I would expect it to be user_home_dir_t in refpolicy.

Any particular reason to not implement Fedoras admin_home_t solution instead?
> 
> 
> -- 
> Chris PeBenito
> Tresys Technology, LLC
> www.tresys.com | oss.tresys.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://oss.tresys.com/pipermail/refpolicy/attachments/20101008/53b9f3b9/attachment.bin