From: dwalsh@redhat.com (Daniel J Walsh)
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:00:35 -0500
Subject: [refpolicy] [PATCH] New database object classes
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTiknbtGZgS-s13tVavz1-q0s0WhffGE1r7+Zcy-D@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4D01F7A4.90708@ak.jp.nec.com>	<4D2FEAE9.8080201@ak.jp.nec.com>	<4D3057AC.3040903@redhat.com>	<AANLkTi=vHcJBGpUKQa0VZDtnFJGQ8Ozgmt4mhihYH-r+@mail.gmail.com>	<4D345E39.1070905@redhat.com>	<4D352D3B.8000303@ak.jp.nec.com>	<4D35A20A.1020400@redhat.com>	<4D35B361.70109@redhat.com>
	<AANLkTiknbtGZgS-s13tVavz1-q0s0WhffGE1r7+Zcy-D@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4D35B923.10809@redhat.com>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 01/18/2011 09:40 AM, Kohei KaiGai wrote:
>>> It looks like your stuff is now in
>>> selinux-policy-3.9.13-2.fc15
>> Yes, it should be there.
>>
> Thanks for your quick job.
> 
> How about backporting it to RHEL6?
> 
> Thanks,
Yes I think that we should get it into RHEL6 also.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk01uSMACgkQrlYvE4MpobNPjQCgwFg5MTGcWzv4UmaRChMh02l+
vOwAnA2tNe+b4cOP7CBS6OhFHqBAtTBW
=bNLZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----