From: domg472@gmail.com (Dominick Grift)
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 17:05:04 +0100
Subject: [refpolicy] optional_policy blocks
In-Reply-To: <1295366016.3083.14.camel@tesla.lan>
References: <1295361554.3083.8.camel@tesla.lan> <4D35AA8C.5050001@gmail.com>
	<1295366016.3083.14.camel@tesla.lan>
Message-ID: <4D35BA30.6020002@gmail.com>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 01/18/2011 04:53 PM, Guido Trentalancia wrote:
> Hello Dominick !
> 
> Thanks very much for your reply.
> 
> On Tue, 18/01/2011 at 15.58 +0100, Dominick Grift wrote:
>> On 01/18/2011 03:39 PM, Guido Trentalancia wrote:
>>> Hello !
>>>
>>> I am trying to build and test a modified version of the git reference
>>> policy. It is being built of type MCS and not monolithic.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, it seems that for some reason all of the
>>> "optional_policy" blocks that are often used in TE files are not being
>>> compiled in.
>>
>> Because optional policy does not apply to monolithic policy. All modules
>> are in a single module (the base module), thus all dependencies are
>> installed.
> 
> I am not building a monolithic policy (please see my original message
> above).

Whoops misread that part, sorry.

> In any case, even if I was building a monolithic policy then I should
> have the optional blocks compiled in for those "modules" that have been
> compiled in the base.

Sounds strange indeed. Are you sure it is not including any of the
policy in optional policy block or just some?

If it is just incidental then it could be an error in the interface in
the optional policy block.

If this really applies to all optional policy then i guess something
else is going on.

> What do you say ?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Guido
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk01ujAACgkQMlxVo39jgT9sAgCglDJgFAq97b3V1BvZxBHa1oCU
WiEAoIOTryxPqZbJEgJ9Sm65cFC6w3Ko
=yS5d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----