From: guido@trentalancia.com (Guido Trentalancia)
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 16:56:06 +0100
Subject: [refpolicy] [PATCH/RFC 0/19]: patch set to update the git
 reference policy
In-Reply-To: <4D3D9456.60608@gmail.com>
References: <1295397630.3377.10.camel@tesla.lan> <4D383627.60804@tresys.com>
	<1295544776.4702.16.camel@tesla.lan> <4D397E26.4090904@tresys.com>
	<1295829820.3862.59.camel@tesla.lan>  <4D3D9456.60608@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1295884566.1547.13.camel@tesla.lan>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

Hello Dominick !

On Mon, 24/01/2011 at 16.01 +0100, Dominick Grift wrote:
> On 01/24/2011 01:43 AM, Guido Trentalancia wrote:
> > Hello again !
> > 
> > I am resubmitting the changes that I proposed a few days ago for the
> > latest reference policy. There are a few additions and now the patch has
> > been split into a set of 19 logical patches.
>
> I did a quick review of your policy and commented inline. I think most
> of it is probably not acceptable at this point unfortunately.

Yes, I have started to look at your comments. Of course they are all
good points that you have made and that need to be changed.

But after those issues will have been fixed, what else would prevent the
patch from being committed ?

> It may be beneficial to get even more familiar with reference policy and
> the concepts/security goals it uses.
> 
> You may also find my latest screencast called: introduction to policy
> writing, inspiring and hopefully informative:
> 
> http://selinux-mac.blogspot.com/2011/01/yet-another-step-by-step-introduction.html

I will have a look at it. Thanks again !

> > Regards,
> > 
> > Guido Trentalancia