From: guido@trentalancia.com (Guido Trentalancia)
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 17:41:45 +0100
Subject: [refpolicy] [PATCH 3/34]: patch to use pam instead of nsswitch
 in the usermanage module
In-Reply-To: <4D63DC86.7070907@tresys.com>
References: <1297836053.3205.32.camel@tesla.lan> <4D63DC86.7070907@tresys.com>
Message-ID: <1298392905.16004.20.camel@tesla.lan>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

On Tue, 22/02/2011 at 10.55 -0500, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
> On 02/16/11 01:00, Guido Trentalancia wrote:
> > This patch allows to use pam instead of nsswitch in
> > policy/modules/admin/usermanage.te.
> 
> Do you have more of an explanation?  auth_use_pam() is much more than
> the rules you're removing.

No, not really. You can drop that. The dbus messaging permissions were
the main point of the whole patch set. Have you had any time to look at
that ?

Regards,

Guido