From: justinmattock@gmail.com (Justin P. Mattock)
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 12:01:15 -0800
Subject: [refpolicy] firefox and the latest git policy
In-Reply-To: <1299711161.6164.4.camel@tesla.lan>
References: <4D77F18C.2070306@gmail.com> <1299707036.2974.1.camel@tesla.lan>	
	<4D77F820.20907@gmail.com> <1299708895.2974.14.camel@tesla.lan>	
	<4D77FE35.6060603@gmail.com> <1299711161.6164.4.camel@tesla.lan>
Message-ID: <4D7A7F8B.7040008@gmail.com>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

On 03/09/2011 02:52 PM, Guido Trentalancia wrote:
> On Wed, 09/03/2011 at 14.24 -0800, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>> On 03/09/2011 02:14 PM, Guido Trentalancia wrote:
>>> Have a look if this helps out (from Sven Vermeulen
>>> <sven.vermeulen@siphos.be>):
>>>
>>> [PATCH 05/15] Allow mozilla/firefox to manage tempfiles
>>> timestamped Wed, 9 Mar 2011 22:11:21 +0100
>>>
>>> firefox is not the most straightforward thing to build. Sometimes (not
>>> very often though) I ended up in an unusable build for example.
>>>
>>> Symptoms ? Logs ?
>>>
>>> It might also depend on the specific version, especially if it is a new
>>> one. Is 4.0 out ?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Guido
>>>
>>
>> the version I am using is 3.6.13(did look at 4 but decided to just build
>> the stable version(which is outdated probably now))without xulrunner
>> being the main base for the lib*'s
>
> I had no problems running that version with refpolicy up to 15022011. If
> it is the latest stable version then I cannot see how that would be
> outdated. I suppose refpolicy is not based on unstable components.
>
> Regards,
>
> Guido
>
>
alright... I went and rewrote all the rules seems fine now(must have 
been something strange going on!)

Justin P. Mattock