From: russell@coker.com.au (Russell Coker)
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 17:31:39 +1000
Subject: [refpolicy] unconfined_cronjob_t et al
Message-ID: <201108181731.39986.russell@coker.com.au>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

Is anyone actually making use of domains such as unconfined_cronjob_t?

Is there any reason why I shouldn't just unilaterally remove them from the 
Debian policy for Squeeze regardless of what Red Hat and upstream are doing?

It seems to me that using a different domain for cron jobs causes pain with no 
gain.

-- 
My Main Blog         http://etbe.coker.com.au/
My Documents Blog    http://doc.coker.com.au/