From: russell@coker.com.au (Russell Coker) Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 17:35:29 +1000 Subject: [refpolicy] unconfined_cronjob_t et al In-Reply-To: <201108181731.39986.russell@coker.com.au> References: <201108181731.39986.russell@coker.com.au> Message-ID: <201108181735.29922.russell@coker.com.au> To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com On Thu, 18 Aug 2011, Russell Coker wrote: > Is there any reason why I shouldn't just unilaterally remove them from the > Debian policy for Squeeze regardless of what Red Hat and upstream are > doing? Sorry I meant to say Wheezy not Squeeze. I'm not making big changes for Squeeze. -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/