From: sven.vermeulen@siphos.be (Sven Vermeulen)
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 22:11:00 +0200
Subject: [refpolicy] [PATCH 03/11] Introduce rc_exec_t as secundary
 entry file for initrc_t
In-Reply-To: <4E5634A7.5060102@tresys.com>
References: <20110823133643.GA857@siphos.be> <20110823134044.GD857@siphos.be>
	<4E5634A7.5060102@tresys.com>
Message-ID: <CAPzO=NzcWe+v0SYuRAujQ8vuQjpBFkm88wnmNywp5Ws53oAaxQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Christopher J. PeBenito
<cpebenito@tresys.com> wrote:
> I think the overall implementation is fine, except everything in this
> patch should be in distro_gentoo blocks, except for the init_rc_exec()
> implementation.

Ok, I assume the exception also holds for the pure type definition
(type rc_exec_t)? Since the init_rc_exec() interface requires it, I
assume that I cannot just put that behind an ifdef(`distro_gentoo')
one, right?

Wkr,
  Sven Vermeulen