From: cpebenito@tresys.com (Christopher J. PeBenito)
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:20:28 -0400
Subject: [refpolicy] [PATCH 03/11] Introduce rc_exec_t as secundary
 entry file for initrc_t
In-Reply-To: <CAPzO=NzcWe+v0SYuRAujQ8vuQjpBFkm88wnmNywp5Ws53oAaxQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20110823133643.GA857@siphos.be> <20110823134044.GD857@siphos.be>
	<4E5634A7.5060102@tresys.com>
	<CAPzO=NzcWe+v0SYuRAujQ8vuQjpBFkm88wnmNywp5Ws53oAaxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4E5CD58C.80503@tresys.com>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

On 08/25/11 16:11, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Christopher J. PeBenito
> <cpebenito@tresys.com> wrote:
>> I think the overall implementation is fine, except everything in this
>> patch should be in distro_gentoo blocks, except for the init_rc_exec()
>> implementation.
> 
> Ok, I assume the exception also holds for the pure type definition
> (type rc_exec_t)? Since the init_rc_exec() interface requires it, I
> assume that I cannot just put that behind an ifdef(`distro_gentoo')
> one, right?

Thats fine.

-- 
Chris PeBenito
Tresys Technology, LLC
www.tresys.com | oss.tresys.com