From: cpebenito@tresys.com (Christopher J. PeBenito) Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 09:30:13 -0400 Subject: [refpolicy] [PATCH 03/11] Introduce rc_exec_t as secundary entry file for initrc_t In-Reply-To: <4E5CD58C.80503@tresys.com> References: <20110823133643.GA857@siphos.be> <20110823134044.GD857@siphos.be> <4E5634A7.5060102@tresys.com> <4E5CD58C.80503@tresys.com> Message-ID: <4E5CE5E5.5090909@tresys.com> To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com On 08/30/11 08:20, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote: > On 08/25/11 16:11, Sven Vermeulen wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Christopher J. PeBenito >> wrote: >>> I think the overall implementation is fine, except everything in this >>> patch should be in distro_gentoo blocks, except for the init_rc_exec() >>> implementation. >> >> Ok, I assume the exception also holds for the pure type definition >> (type rc_exec_t)? Since the init_rc_exec() interface requires it, I >> assume that I cannot just put that behind an ifdef(`distro_gentoo') >> one, right? > > Thats fine. Actually, you can put the definition in the distro_gentoo. We already have examples of interfaces that reference types that are optionally declared. -- Chris PeBenito Tresys Technology, LLC www.tresys.com | oss.tresys.com