From: nicky726@gmail.com (Nicky726)
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 20:15:58 +0200
Subject: [refpolicy] Building refpolicy fails on Arch Linux
In-Reply-To: <4E4E7C4E.8000708@tresys.com>
References: <4032582.qCZDJWTUCx@hikari> <2630178.sj9B4IeKCZ@hikari>
	<4E4E7C4E.8000708@tresys.com>
Message-ID: <1851802.b6gYmqOXcx@hikari>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

Dne P? 19. srpna 2011 11.07:58 jste napsal(a): 
> Actually its Gentoo's version.  I haven't heard any problems from Dan
> about compile errors like this in Fedora, so I'm still thinking its your
> toolchain.  Did you rebuild checkpolicy after changing flex and bison?
> This pops up from time to time, the last thread I can find on it is here:
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=selinux&m=126762983301065&w=2
> 
> Also cc'ing Steve Smalley in case he has any additional feedback.
> 
> Steve: maybe we should put up a page on the selinuxproject.org about
> these flex issues.  Maybe a summary of what we know or known bad
> versions or something.

I tried various combinations of versions of flex, bison and selinux userspace. I didn't succede on my SELinux netbook. I managed to build refpolicy on my 
primary machine with just latest SELinux Userspace and prehistoric flex (2.5.4a-4), that is version combination which does not build the policy on my 
netbook. I don't quite get it, especially as the software configuration is quite alike.

Nicky

Don't it always seem to go
That you don't know what you've got
Till it's gone

(Joni Mitchell)