From: domg472@gmail.com (Dominick Grift)
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 23:12:10 +0200
Subject: [refpolicy] ANN: Reference Policy contrib repository
In-Reply-To: <4E6E6F81.6020207@redhat.com>
References: <4E6A3225.2090502@tresys.com> <1315585353.2170.6.camel@vortex>
	<4E6A3EC9.9000200@tresys.com> <4E6E6F81.6020207@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <4E6FC72A.80302@gmail.com>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

Op 12-9-2011 22:45, Daniel J Walsh schreef:

> 
> AS we move to this new format, I would suggest we require multiple at
> least 2 ACKs to get a policy update.  I don't think Fedora team should
> just dump our policy into the contrib without having someone review it.
> 
> Dominick Grift has done a lot of work in this space and if he would be
> willing to help that would be great.
> 
> Anyone else who would like to volunteer.  I think Miroslav and I have
> to work to get the Rawhide/F16 policy based off the new structure and
> then make the Fedora policy available for others to begin acking.

Sure, i will be willing to review patches. Where should they be sent to
for review? This list?

> _______________________________________________
> refpolicy mailing list
> refpolicy at oss.tresys.com
> http://oss.tresys.com/mailman/listinfo/refpolicy


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://oss.tresys.com/pipermail/refpolicy/attachments/20110913/c35681ac/attachment.bin