From: cpebenito@tresys.com (Christopher J. PeBenito)
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 09:36:36 -0400
Subject: [refpolicy] dccp socket support
In-Reply-To: <1317110300.2861.22.camel@x220.mydomain.internal>
References: <1317110300.2861.22.camel@x220.mydomain.internal>
Message-ID: <4E81D164.1030601@tresys.com>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

On 09/27/11 03:58, Dominick Grift wrote:
> Can dccp socket support be merged/added to refpolicy? 
> 
> The dccp_socket class was added but refpolicy was never adapted to this
> addition.

I definitely don't oppose this, but I don't remember seeing much usage of DCCP.  I wouldn't reject a patch because it has DCCP.

> We tried to do this in Fedora, so that might be usable to some degree.
> ( i guess it can at least be used as rough guide to what we think needs
> to be done to add this support )
> 
> Please see the two commits regarding dccp sockets:
> 
> http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=selinux-policy.git&a=search&h=HEAD&st=commit&s=dccp

I took a cursory look, and it seems ok, but some of the unrelated changes would have to be filtered out.

-- 
Chris PeBenito
Tresys Technology, LLC
www.tresys.com | oss.tresys.com