From: sven.vermeulen@siphos.be (Sven Vermeulen)
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 21:06:43 +0100
Subject: [refpolicy] Contribute blueman dbus mechanism policy from Fedora
In-Reply-To: <4F072CE7.3030904@redhat.com>
References: <4F072CE7.3030904@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20120109200643.GA3416@siphos.be>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 12:18:31PM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> Policy from Fedora for blueman dbus mechanism.
[...]
> +########################################
> +#
> +# Declarations
> +#
> +
> +type blueman_t;
> +type blueman_exec_t;
> +dbus_system_domain(blueman_t, blueman_exec_t)

Personally I'd put the dbus_system_domain() through an optional_policy() as
we (Gentoo) don't have dbus as part of base. But I can imagine that systemd
using distributions probably do have dbus as part of base ;-)

Looks okay.

Acked-by: Sven Vermeulen <sven.vermeulen@siphos.be>