From: dwalsh@redhat.com (Daniel J Walsh)
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:22:24 -0500
Subject: [refpolicy] Contribute blueman dbus mechanism policy from Fedora
In-Reply-To: <20120109200643.GA3416@siphos.be>
References: <4F072CE7.3030904@redhat.com> <20120109200643.GA3416@siphos.be>
Message-ID: <4F0B4C80.8090209@redhat.com>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 01/09/2012 03:06 PM, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 12:18:31PM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>> Policy from Fedora for blueman dbus mechanism.
> [...]
>> +######################################## +# +# Declarations +# 
>> + +type blueman_t; +type blueman_exec_t; 
>> +dbus_system_domain(blueman_t, blueman_exec_t)
> 
> Personally I'd put the dbus_system_domain() through an
> optional_policy() as we (Gentoo) don't have dbus as part of base.
> But I can imagine that systemd using distributions probably do have
> dbus as part of base ;-)
> 
> Looks okay.
> 
Since this is a dbus service, that really would not make much sense, I
would guess distributions that don't support dbus services would not
include these policies.
> Acked-by: Sven Vermeulen <sven.vermeulen@siphos.be>
> 
> _______________________________________________ refpolicy mailing
> list refpolicy at oss.tresys.com 
> http://oss.tresys.com/mailman/listinfo/refpolicy

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk8LTIAACgkQrlYvE4MpobMrdwCeKDLnCkBrdE+EPqx4dfvIs17B
HDcAoI/jmi/kqVI9bnjuLij+hsakToHs
=rYcM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----