From: sven.vermeulen@siphos.be (Sven Vermeulen)
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 22:10:50 +0100
Subject: [refpolicy] Contribute blueman dbus mechanism policy from Fedora
In-Reply-To: <4F0B4C80.8090209@redhat.com>
References: <4F072CE7.3030904@redhat.com> <20120109200643.GA3416@siphos.be>
	<4F0B4C80.8090209@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20120109211050.GH3416@siphos.be>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 03:22:24PM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> > Personally I'd put the dbus_system_domain() through an
> > optional_policy() as we (Gentoo) don't have dbus as part of base.
> > But I can imagine that systemd using distributions probably do have
> > dbus as part of base ;-)
> > 
> > Looks okay.
> > 
> 
> Since this is a dbus service, that really would not make much sense, I
> would guess distributions that don't support dbus services would not
> include these policies.

Well, we support dbus, but it's not mandatory. But I agree that it is
unlikely someone installs this policy and not the dbus one (which is
probably then best done through the package managers' dependency features).

Wkr,
	Sven Vermeulen