From: dominick.grift@gmail.com (Dominick Grift)
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 15:57:17 +0200
Subject: [refpolicy] [PATCH v3 1/3] Support read/append/manage functions
 for various httpd content
In-Reply-To: <4FE9B7AD.6010707@tresys.com>
References: <20120624110736.GA995@siphos.be>
	<20120624110826.GB995@siphos.be> <4FE9B7AD.6010707@tresys.com>
Message-ID: <1340719037.12652.6.camel@x220.mydomain.internal>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com


> > +########################################
> > +## <summary>
> > +##	Append to all appendable web content files.
> > +## </summary>
> > +## <param name="domain">
> > +##	<summary>
> > +##	Domain allowed access.
> > +##	</summary>
> > +## </param>
> > +## <rolecap/>
> > +#
> > +interface(`apache_append_all_ra_content_files',`
> 
> Inconsistent interface naming.  I'm ok w/o the _files.
> 

SwifT , i was the one who suggesting this change. I'm sorry about that.

I personally prefer this and do not agree with the inconsistency comment
but i guess others do not agree with me.

I guess next time i suggest a similar change feel free to ignore it.