From: dominick.grift@gmail.com (Dominick Grift)
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 23:42:16 +0200
Subject: [refpolicy] [PATCH 1/1] blueman contrib policy
In-Reply-To: <4FEA2BA0.3020202@redhat.com>
References: <4FEA2517.90200@redhat.com>
	<1340745635.12652.23.camel@x220.mydomain.internal>
	<4FEA2964.1090102@redhat.com> <4FEA2BA0.3020202@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1340746936.12652.34.camel@x220.mydomain.internal>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 23:37 +0200, Miroslav Grepl wrote:
> On 06/26/2012 11:28 PM, Miroslav Grepl wrote:
> > On 06/26/2012 11:20 PM, Dominick Grift wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 23:09 +0200, Miroslav Grepl wrote:
> >>
> >> There is a significant difference between the way reference policy
> >> implemented auth_use_nsswitch and the way fedora implemented it.
> >>
> >> This leads me to believe that, since this policy relies on
> >> auth_use_nsswitch, it should probably be modified to reflect these
> >> changes between fedora's and refpolicy's auth_use_nsswitch()
> > You could say it about lot of policies which are in the contrib repo.
> >
> > Let's discuss it.
> Also I don't see this big differences. We use nsswitch_domain attribute 
> now which will also submit as a patch.

Hmm yes you are right, there are some changes but its not as big as i
thought.