From: mgrepl@redhat.com (Miroslav Grepl)
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 19:51:59 +0200
Subject: [refpolicy] [PATCH 1/1] blueman contrib policy
In-Reply-To: <4FEB19F7.4000003@tresys.com>
References: <4FEA2517.90200@redhat.com>
	<1340745635.12652.23.camel@x220.mydomain.internal>
	<4FEA2964.1090102@redhat.com> <4FEB19F7.4000003@tresys.com>
Message-ID: <4FEB483F.4080605@redhat.com>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

On 06/27/2012 04:34 PM, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
> On 06/26/12 17:28, Miroslav Grepl wrote:
>> On 06/26/2012 11:20 PM, Dominick Grift wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 23:09 +0200, Miroslav Grepl wrote:
>>>
>>> There is a significant difference between the way reference policy
>>> implemented auth_use_nsswitch and the way fedora implemented it.
>>>
>>> This leads me to believe that, since this policy relies on
>>> auth_use_nsswitch, it should probably be modified to reflect these
>>> changes between fedora's and refpolicy's auth_use_nsswitch()
>> You could say it about lot of policies which are in the contrib repo.
>>
>> Let's discuss it.
> Not surprising.  Last time I think anything has been upstreamed from Fedora/Red Hat was in January.
>
We did al lot of work to  switch our structure to reflect upstream 
structure to make patches much more easier. Also these changes related 
to auth_use_nsswitch are not so big. We use nsswitch_domain attribute. 
Basically we now use more attributes to shrink the policy .

I believe now it will be easier to add our patches.

Regards,
Miroslav