From: russell@coker.com.au (Russell Coker) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 21:55:01 +1000 Subject: [refpolicy] pptp_t vs pppd_t In-Reply-To: <4FF2DBE3.7030106@redhat.com> References: <201207031543.56296.russell@coker.com.au> <4FF2D4EE.6050805@redhat.com> <4FF2DBE3.7030106@redhat.com> Message-ID: <201207032155.01993.russell@coker.com.au> To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com On Tue, 3 Jul 2012, Miroslav Grepl wrote: > > I really believe we should consolidate the mail domains. mail_t instead > > of sendmail_t, postfix_t, qmail_t, dovecot_t, courier_t ... > > I agree with this. The question is whether it could be accepted? Red Hat had a 152,000 line patch against the policy source last time I checked. It doesn't seem that patch acceptance or the lack of it is slowing them down. -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/