From: cpebenito@tresys.com (Christopher J. PeBenito)
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 13:58:14 -0400
Subject: [refpolicy] [PATCH v2 2/3] user access to DOS filesystems
In-Reply-To: <1346860228-12760-1-git-send-email-bigon@debian.org>
References: <1346828428.15262.53.camel@d30.localdomain>
<1346860228-12760-1-git-send-email-bigon@debian.org>
Message-ID: <504792B6.2050606@tresys.com>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com
On 09/05/12 11:50, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> From: Mika Pfl??ger
>
> Add a new boolean to grant users access to dosfs_t.
> ---
> policy/global_tunables | 7 +++++++
> policy/modules/system/userdomain.if | 6 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/policy/global_tunables b/policy/global_tunables
> index 4705ab6..092df0b 100644
> --- a/policy/global_tunables
> +++ b/policy/global_tunables
> @@ -111,3 +111,10 @@ gen_tunable(use_samba_home_dirs,false)
> ##
> ##
> gen_tunable(user_tcp_server,false)
> +
> +##
> +##
> +## Determine whether users can manage dosfs content.
> +##
> +##
> +gen_tunable(userdomain_manage_dos_content,false)
This should be moved to the userdomain module, as its effect is only in that module. Global tunables should only be used if the tunable is used in multiple modules.
> diff --git a/policy/modules/system/userdomain.if b/policy/modules/system/userdomain.if
> index e720dcd..949c738 100644
> --- a/policy/modules/system/userdomain.if
> +++ b/policy/modules/system/userdomain.if
> @@ -117,6 +117,12 @@ template(`userdom_base_user_template',`
> # Allow making the stack executable via mprotect.
> allow $1_t self:process execstack;
> ')
> +
> + tunable_policy(`userdomain_manage_dos_content',`
> + fs_manage_dos_dirs($1_t)
> + fs_manage_dos_files($1_t)
> + ')
> +
This is too low level of a template for this access. It should be moved to a higher level template such as userdom_common_user_template. userdom_base_user_template is supposed to define the most minimal user.
--
Chris PeBenito
Tresys Technology, LLC
www.tresys.com | oss.tresys.com