From: bigon@debian.org (Laurent Bigonville)
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 16:24:01 +0200
Subject: [refpolicy] [PATCH 2/3] user access to DOS files
In-Reply-To: <1346793669-26282-2-git-send-email-bigon@debian.org>
References: <1346793669-26282-1-git-send-email-bigon@debian.org>
	<1346793669-26282-2-git-send-email-bigon@debian.org>
Message-ID: <20120906162401.79ccd07b@eldamar.bigon.be>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

Le Tue,  4 Sep 2012 23:21:08 +0200,
Laurent Bigonville <bigon@debian.org> a ?crit :

> +	tunable_policy(`user_manage_dos_files',`
> +		fs_manage_dos_dirs($1_t)
> +		fs_manage_dos_files($1_t)
> +	')
> +
>  ')

I was reading the code further and isn't the proposed patch actually
redundant with user_rw_noexattrfile?

        tunable_policy(`user_rw_noexattrfile',`
                fs_manage_noxattr_fs_files($1_t)
                fs_manage_noxattr_fs_dirs($1_t)
        ',`
                fs_read_noxattr_fs_files($1_t)
        ')

So shouldn't the proposed patch simply be dropped?

Cheers

Laurent Bigonville