From: sven.vermeulen@siphos.be (Sven Vermeulen) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 17:30:22 +0200 Subject: [refpolicy] [PATCH 1/2] Label /var/run/mdadm/map as mdadm_map_t In-Reply-To: <50521AF7.90906@tresys.com> References: <1347406308-20976-1-git-send-email-bigon@debian.org> <1347468575.2915.16.camel@d30.localdomain> <5051FD8F.9020801@redhat.com> <1347552568.2915.30.camel@d30.localdomain> <50521AF7.90906@tresys.com> Message-ID: To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com On Sep 13, 2012 7:43 PM, "Christopher J. PeBenito" wrote: > I'm fine with it. I suspect its a remnant of the original targeted policy where only network-facing services were confined. We have been running without unconfined in Gentoo on quite a few systems with raid and swraid with little additional patches on the domain. I even think without patches, but don't have access to the patch list currently to verify. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://oss.tresys.com/pipermail/refpolicy/attachments/20120914/747e36d2/attachment.html