From: dominick.grift@gmail.com (Dominick Grift) Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 14:14:37 +0200 Subject: [refpolicy] [PATCH] Changes to the dbus policy and its dependencies In-Reply-To: <506D7C2B.408@tresys.com> References: <1349302198.22995.25.camel@d30.localdomain> <1349304574.22995.32.camel@d30.localdomain> <506D7C2B.408@tresys.com> Message-ID: <1349352877.22995.44.camel@d30.localdomain> To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 08:08 -0400, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote: > > I know i should probably have deprecated the dbus_session_bus_client() > > but by doing so i would make the interface name unavailable for its new > > use. > > > > Then it would get really messy and so i decided to just overlook this > > incident and go with this solution. There is one other similar case in > > the dbus module but i doubt anyone will hit that. > > No, these need to be deprecated appropriately. > ok i will do so and use dbus_spec_session_bus_client()