From: dwalsh@redhat.com (Daniel J Walsh) Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 13:19:29 -0400 Subject: [refpolicy] [REVIEW REQUEST] Changes to the gnome policy module In-Reply-To: <1349364272.22995.49.camel@d30.localdomain> References: <1349277155-3545-1-git-send-email-dominick.grift@gmail.com> <1349348491.22995.43.camel@d30.localdomain> <506DA2E4.1080004@redhat.com> <1349364272.22995.49.camel@d30.localdomain> Message-ID: <506DC521.30903@redhat.com> To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/04/2012 11:24 AM, Dominick Grift wrote: > > > On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 10:53 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > >> That is fine, and something we can try out in Fedora 19. > > I think we should should extend the userdomain policy module to reflect the > freedesktop changes > > That means deal appropriately with /run/user/UID, $HOME/.cache > $HOME/.config and $HOME/.local/share in the userdomain policy module > I am fine with this. Is it enought to just add an equivalence from /run/user -> /home -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlBtxSEACgkQrlYvE4MpobO0AQCgw/QQJoo72tP+DBA0JpJO7PL8 16cAoL/WdijXdW7c39xJ/0lYgXrRMhs1 =IBsU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----