From: dwalsh@redhat.com (Daniel J Walsh) Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 15:04:40 -0400 Subject: [refpolicy] [REVIEW REQUEST] Changes to the gnome policy module In-Reply-To: <1349372785.22995.53.camel@d30.localdomain> References: <1349277155-3545-1-git-send-email-dominick.grift@gmail.com> <1349348491.22995.43.camel@d30.localdomain> <506DA2E4.1080004@redhat.com> <1349364272.22995.49.camel@d30.localdomain> <506DC521.30903@redhat.com> <1349372352.22995.51.camel@d30.localdomain> <1349372785.22995.53.camel@d30.localdomain> Message-ID: <506DDDC8.5060602@redhat.com> To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/04/2012 01:46 PM, Dominick Grift wrote: > > > On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 19:39 +0200, Dominick Grift wrote: >> >> >>> Is it enought to just add an equivalence from /run/user -> /home >>> >> >> The have changed from /run/user/USER to /run/user/UID so i do not think >> genhomedircon will work (?). >> > > But anyway , i guess we could do that. I haven't really thought about that. > What do you think would be best? > > > Well also the content in this directory does not match correctly for the file context. /run/user/3267/dconf/ versus /home/dwalsh/.config/dconf? Kerberos keyring is there now also there which used to be labeled user_tmp_t. Gkeyringd_tmp_t content is there which also used to be in /tmp. X11-display seems to be moving here also. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlBt3cgACgkQrlYvE4MpobOQbwCfSRNWqvG8kswUq1b/AmnmK0wa 1/wAnR5cnIDYU/SunckKVVdMLBHjE5dW =WstD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----