From: sven.vermeulen@siphos.be (Sven Vermeulen)
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 10:35:52 +0200
Subject: [refpolicy] Port name for port 8200
Message-ID: <20130428083551.GA11457@siphos.be>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

Hi all

I'm writing a policy for minidlna (I'll submit it soon for review) and
noticed that it needs to bind on tcp port 8200. Currently, this port is not
named (thus marked as unreserved_port_t). Most port databases have it
assigned as "trivnet1".

What is the best approach to take here? Have corenetwork mark the port as
trivnet1_port_t and use the corenet_*_trivnet1 methods, or keep it as
unreserved? Or do assign it but name it differently?

I prefer the first (i.e. define trivnet1_port_t).

Wkr,
	Sven Vermeulen