From: a.kuckartz@ping.de (Andreas Kuckartz)
Date: 19 Sep 2013 11:07:25 +0200
Subject: [refpolicy] Fwd: Debian unstable, SELinux and Iceweasel
In-Reply-To: <1379577562.16771.30.camel@d30>
References: <52384CD9.60604@ping.de> <5239AEFF.6000902@ping.de>
	<1379534082.16771.19.camel@d30> <1379535027.16771.21.camel@d30>
	<523AA6C3.5000105@ping.de> <1379577562.16771.30.camel@d30>
Message-ID: <523ABECD.1080807@ping.de>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

Dominick Grift:
> Ive confined basic desktop sessions (actually various times) I
> actually recorded the whole process of my latest endeavor and put it
> on your tube ( it is a 100 plus hours worth of screencast )
> (youtube.com/domg4721)

Thanks. (But edited best-of versions would help ;-)

> Besides Debian has no active selinux maintainers.
> Things been stale for quite a while there now.

I noticed that the reference policy used by Debian is more than two
years old. But some work on the policy build system seems to have
started again in May 2013.

> Want to take on the challenge of maintaining SELinux in Debian?

I can not promise anything at the moment but I am having a closer look
at the state of SELinux in Debian.

Cheers,
Andreas