From: dwalsh@redhat.com (Daniel J Walsh)
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 10:35:44 -0500
Subject: [refpolicy] [PATCH 24/39] This should probably eventually end
 up with xdm_home_t type like Fedora,
 but the file is currently created with xauth_home_t type so i just added a
 file context spec for that for failover
In-Reply-To: <1386340177.2469.61.camel@d30>
References: <1383990320-3340-1-git-send-email-dominick.grift@gmail.com>		<1383990320-3340-24-git-send-email-dominick.grift@gmail.com>		<52A1D278.2000506@tresys.com>
	<1386338185.2469.57.camel@d30>	 <52A1D844.4070702@redhat.com>
	<1386340177.2469.61.camel@d30>
Message-ID: <52A1EED0.2010709@redhat.com>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 12/06/2013 09:29 AM, Dominick Grift wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 08:59 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> 
>> In fedora we have xdm_home_t.
>> 
>> matchpathcon ~/.xsession-errors /home/dwalsh/.xsession-errors
>> staff_u:object_r:xdm_home_t:s0
>> 
>> 
> 
> Thanks, yes i know, the question i have is, is it worth it to create a 
> private type for this.
> 
> 
Maybe not.  At least gdm and kdm no longer create this content, I think they
are writing it to journald now.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlKh7tAACgkQrlYvE4MpobN3SwCfe7IPBQlzPwdRLtwLCj6SrF8f
ABcAoOLZcLFBCR8C9XuyiRPZGbD8EMHK
=f6kz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----