From: russell@coker.com.au (Russell Coker)
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 12:04:07 +1100
Subject: [refpolicy] Transition unconfined users to dpkg_t domain
In-Reply-To: <1389379945.20258.33.camel@x220.localdomain>
References: <20140109165738.77a1d0a8@soldur.bigon.be>
	<52D03E91.1000600@tycho.nsa.gov>
	<1389379945.20258.33.camel@x220.localdomain>
Message-ID: <49627420.OsS9p7pMfV@russell.coker.com.au>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 19:52:25 Dominick Grift wrote:
> Not sure if i am choosing my words right here but rpm_t, rpm_script_t
> domains are a fallacy in the first place:
> 
> # seinfo -xaunconfined_domain_type | grep rpm
>       rpm_t
>       rpm_script_t

That's only if you have unconfined.pp loaded.  While it's not common to run 
without it I aim to support such configurations in Debian and use them on some 
of my systems.

-- 
My Main Blog         http://etbe.coker.com.au/
My Documents Blog    http://doc.coker.com.au/