From: dominick.grift@gmail.com (Dominick Grift)
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 14:54:57 +0100
Subject: [refpolicy] systemd policy
In-Reply-To: <52D53CF9.8030900@tresys.com>
References: <5992094.YlEUt0BCZP@russell.coker.com.au>
	<5347508.kSSh66cgIv@russell.coker.com.au>	<52D401D3.5040900@redhat.com>
	<3417214.hAyNvCIVsu@russell.coker.com.au> <52D53CF9.8030900@tresys.com>
Message-ID: <1389707697.28251.48.camel@x220.localdomain>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 08:34 -0500, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
> There's also questions about the socket activation and how that fits in.

I think Fedoras' policy also does not deal elegantly with socket
activation. I would like to see a separate interface with all the
relevant socket activation rules in there.