From: sven.vermeulen@siphos.be (Sven Vermeulen)
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 18:57:45 +0200
Subject: [refpolicy] Do we need to keep "aliased" interfaces?
Message-ID: <20140529165745.GA10882@siphos.be>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

Hi all

We need a gnome_dbus_chat_gconfd interface, but if I were to follow the same
development pattern as for instance gnome_dbus_chat_gkeyringd then I would
need to create a gnome_dbus_chat_gconfd(<prefix>, <userdomain>) and a
gnome_dbus_chat_all_gconfd(<userdomain>) interface.

Now, the one with prefix support is to work on the *_gconfd_t types. These
are all aliases to gconfd_t, so there is no need to have different
interfaces.

Is it ok to just have a gnome_dbus_chat_gconfd(<userdomain>) method?

I really dislike the "all_gconfd" one as, in my opinion, it implies that
there are multiple gconfd domains "tied" together with some attribute, which
isn't the case.

Wkr,
	Sven Vermeulen