From: cpebenito@tresys.com (Christopher J. PeBenito)
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 15:40:08 -0400
Subject: [refpolicy] [PATCH 4/5] Introduce the tmpfiles_t domain
In-Reply-To: <1407434738-11937-5-git-send-email-sven.vermeulen@siphos.be>
References: <1407434738-11937-1-git-send-email-sven.vermeulen@siphos.be>
	<1407434738-11937-5-git-send-email-sven.vermeulen@siphos.be>
Message-ID: <53ED1098.1000401@tresys.com>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

On 8/7/2014 2:05 PM, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> +policy_module(tmpfiles, 1.0.0)
[...]
> +type tmpfiles_var_run_t;
> +files_pid_file(tmpfiles_var_run_t)

Nothing really jumped out at me as being a problem, but since most
(all?) distributions have moved towards these files being in /run, I'd
prefer to get away from having "var_run" in the type names.  Why don't
we go with something like tmpfiles_run_t or tmpfiles_pid_t?

-- 
Chris PeBenito
Tresys Technology, LLC
www.tresys.com | oss.tresys.com