From: mgrepl@redhat.com (Miroslav Grepl) Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 10:27:09 +0100 Subject: [refpolicy] Syntax fixes in contrib In-Reply-To: <20141202161542.GA16393@e145.network2> References: <1416983956-8770-1-git-send-email-jason@perfinion.com> <547DDB5A.3000307@tresys.com> <20141202161542.GA16393@e145.network2> Message-ID: <547ED76D.5010709@redhat.com> To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com On 12/02/2014 05:15 PM, Dominick Grift wrote: > On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 10:31:38AM -0500, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote: >> On 11/26/2014 1:38 AM, Jason Zaman wrote: >>> I was going through the policy and adding all the _admin interfaces to sysadm >>> in the gentoo policy and hit quite a number of syntax errors. They are mostly >>> just typos and missing types in gen_require. > The problem with the admin interfaces (any interfaces for that matter) is that unless they are called they aren't tested. > > This is also one of the reasons why i prefer only adding interfaces that are actually used. > > On that other hand, adding interfaces even if they aren't used does make sense for audit2allow/sepolgen-ifgen, and for the confined admin support > > > > _______________________________________________ > refpolicy mailing list > refpolicy at oss.tresys.com > http://oss.tresys.com/mailman/listinfo/refpolicy We have tests for testing these _admin() interfaces in RHEL. I believe we could add them to Fedora to have them available. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://oss.tresys.com/pipermail/refpolicy/attachments/20141203/b5a422d1/attachment-0001.html