From: jason@perfinion.com (Jason Zaman)
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 17:21:33 +0400
Subject: [refpolicy] [PATCH] Introduce init_manage_service_template
 interface
In-Reply-To: <5559E1D1.6090107@tresys.com>
References: <1431642524-14781-1-git-send-email-jason@perfinion.com>
	<5559E1D1.6090107@tresys.com>
Message-ID: <20150518132133.GB22574@meriadoc.Home>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 08:57:53AM -0400, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
> On 5/14/2015 6:28 PM, Jason Zaman wrote:
> > This is to be used where a role needs to start and stop a service. It
> > centralizes all the rules for redhat < 6 sysvinit that were used in the
> > _admin interfaces. The rules for other inits will be added later.
> 
> I'm ok with this set, though I'm trying to decide if this is the right
> name for this template.  I'm not sure if we should overload "manage"
> since it already is create/read/write/delete on files, dirs, etc.

I would be quite willing to change the name if there is a better one. I
agree "manage" is overloaded. Although "start" doesnt work either since
the template would be for stopping / status / etc as well.

Is there any other verb that is used to in this context we can use
instead?

-- Jason