From: dwalsh@redhat.com (Daniel J Walsh)
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 10:33:12 -0400
Subject: [refpolicy] kdbus support
In-Reply-To: <55BF6C54.9070806@tycho.nsa.gov>
References: <55BF5F1B.1010002@redhat.com> <55BF6C54.9070806@tycho.nsa.gov>
Message-ID: <55BF7BA8.8000905@redhat.com>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com



On 08/03/2015 09:27 AM, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On 08/03/2015 08:31 AM, Miroslav Grepl wrote:
>> I am working on kdbus support on Fedora 24. Basically we need to add
>> support for
>>
>> /sys/fs/kdbus
>>
>> and I am thinking about correct labeling. Something like
>>
>> +type kdbusfs_t;
>> +fs_type(kdbusfs_t)
>> +files_mountpoint(kdbusfs_t)
>> +dev_associate_sysfs(kdbusfs_t)
>> +genfscon kdbusfs / gen_context(system_u:object_r:kdbusfs_t,s0)
>>
>> What do you think about kdbusfs_t label?
> Until kdbus has LSM hooks, it should not be accessible by anything.
> Otherwise, it is a completely uncontrolled IPC mechanism by which
> anything is free to violate policy on the system.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> refpolicy mailing list
> refpolicy at oss.tresys.com
> http://oss.tresys.com/mailman/listinfo/refpolicy
Well Rawhide is totally broken right now, and everyone has to boot in
permissive mode.

We need to allow this for now and then fix the kernel.