From: dac.override@gmail.com (Dominick Grift)
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 16:06:33 +0200
Subject: [refpolicy] gpg typealiases
In-Reply-To: <20150810160410.7c1eb994@gentp.lnet>
References: <20150810160410.7c1eb994@gentp.lnet>
Message-ID: <20150810140631.GE3707@x250>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 04:04:10PM +0200, Luis Ressel wrote:
> Do we still need those typealiases in the gpg policy for
> anything? ("typealias gpg_t alias { user_gpg_t staff_gpg_t
> sysadm_gpg_t };" etc.)

If we need them then we only need them for existing types (backwards compability). So you do not need them for any dirmngr types that you create.

> 
> Regards,
> Luis Ressel
> _______________________________________________
> refpolicy mailing list
> refpolicy at oss.tresys.com
> http://oss.tresys.com/mailman/listinfo/refpolicy

-- 
02DFF788
4D30 903A 1CF3 B756 FB48  1514 3148 83A2 02DF F788
http://keys.gnupg.net/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x314883A202DFF788
Dominick Grift
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 648 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://oss.tresys.com/pipermail/refpolicy/attachments/20150810/ab447e44/attachment.bin