From: dac.override@gmail.com (Dominick Grift) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 18:11:50 +0100 Subject: [refpolicy] Use of distro_rhel6/7 in refpolicy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20151217171148.GA26674@x250> To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 12:00:14PM -0500, Mike Palmiotto wrote: > It appears that the major-version-specific redhat ifdefs were > abandoned as of 6624f9cf7a3cdc3deb19ca680f559011a75e5e9f, in favor of > generic distro names. Considering the fact that there are some major > differences between RHEL6 and RHEL7, I wonder if it would be > worthwhile to re-introduce major version numbers. It seems like > current efforts have been using 'init_systemd,' but that doesn't seem > appropriate for non-systemd policy. I suspect "init_systemd" is probably the most accurate identifier you one can have in this case. systemd is not a RH specific technology even though it is heavily influenced by RH. Thus using "distro_rhel7" to indicate systemd seems like a bit of a stretch. > > Is there a particular reason why we wouldn't want to be more specific > with the distro ifdefs? > > Respectfully, > --Mike > _______________________________________________ > refpolicy mailing list > refpolicy at oss.tresys.com > http://oss.tresys.com/mailman/listinfo/refpolicy - -- 02DFF788 4D30 903A 1CF3 B756 FB48 1514 3148 83A2 02DF F788 https://sks-keyservers.net/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x314883A202DFF788 Dominick Grift -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQGcBAEBCgAGBQJWcuzQAAoJENAR6kfG5xmcYGcL/3V0kK53j6JmKwviBix17hpw dgWYJYcuIw8gWcdG+ClAmt+mspPoxo324lvLvBsYOLK2c3KD/O4gDtezr+snLE89 W/1pmZNW51Ved0muefZW892+aP6fYbYD9vjCXe19IlcQGiqXIZWad0J+qrlt2xbe rvHXpOTZ+a6HI7Mqkqmc2Gp4NG1tx1YbrgdOX1mNb0O5o6FAl6a4d3HwcWbej9R6 KoOXm/EmzQB/JS68FxaCKJ8LgIrE4p0RhdXCXAoKNyGQSPpoMv6rpjJFUtkJPqcu 0+vkzUmIAPDXLhCQwGErRJ/Q/QHG14HLXB8/Xdj2y8zjHria2jKZl0iyI6gCl9/n QYSEY84/+dH72ROS9MJZMA6XBUUQTkBD/f2kQ9bQUJDYJREtQpvPisIW4//6Q3+G jzhURFK/csiOHibLuw9UR7ELfM3jg7IhT4Gei8EBCF116Kgoz6KabDh30LZfgObF Mqhk3P5UdM8diZNzqgz6br5mNWlfZkaGCya0EoOnJw== =xOGX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----